IEC 62061– Safety Integrity Level (SIL) by PILZ

MC IEC 62061 Safety Integrated Level by PILZ 1 400

July 18, 2022

 

Functional safety in accordance with IEC 62061

IEC 62061 / EN IEC 62061 represents a sector-specific standard under IEC 61508. It describes the implementation of safety-related control systems on machinery and examines the whole lifecycle from the concept phase through to decommissioning.

The new edition of IEC 62061 was published in 2021. This new edition is not just an update of the existing standard. For a start, the standard is no longer limited to electrical systems but can be used for all types of technology, such as hydraulic or pneumatic systems for example.

IEC 62061:2021 harmonized as EU standard EN IEC 62061:2021!

In April 2022, IEC 62061 was published in the Official Journal of the EU as harmonized standard EN IEC 62061, the content being identical.

MC IEC 62061 Safety Integrated Level by PILZ 2 400

As a result, presumption of conformity has officially come into force within the EU. A manufacturer can assume that he meets the health and safety requirements of the Machinery Directive if he complies with the provisions of the EU standard. In the conformity assessment procedure, he can issue the declaration of conformity and so affix the CE mark to his plant or machinery.

Presumption of conformity for the previous version EN 62061:2005 ends on 11 October 2023 at the latest! After this transition period, new declarations of conformity can only be issued on the basis of EN IEC 62061:2021.

The European Commission announced the newly harmonized standards on the EU website with CID 2022/ 621, dated April 2022. As of May 2022, they have not yet been published by the EU Commission in the informal “Summary List”!

To read about thge procedure for publishing harmonized standards in the EU, click here 

 

MC IEC 62061 Safety Integrated Level by PILZ 5 400

You can also listen to the PILZ podcast “For Your Safety” to hear about the “Updates to the Standard IEC 62061” by clicking here 

Important changes to IEC 62061 / EN IEC 62061:

  • •Changes to the methodology used to define the required SIL level
  • •The need to draft a Safety Requirements Specification
  • •The option to use devices developed in accordance with other standards
  • •More details on safety-related application software

 

 

 

Contents of IEC 62061

MC IEC 62061 Safety Integrated Level by PILZ 3 400

IEC 62061 addresses the issue of how reliable a safety-related control system needs to be. In this case the estimation is based on a hybrid method, a combination of a matrix and a quantitative approach. It also addresses the validation of safety functions based on architectural and statistical methods.

As with EN ISO 13849-1, the objective is to establish the suitability of safety measures to reduce risks. Even with this standard, extensive calculations are required. You can significantly reduce the work involved by using appropriate software such as the Safety Calculator PAScal.

 

How do you determine the required safety integrity in accordance with IEC 62061?

For each risk requiring a safety-related control system, the risk must be estimated, and the risk reduction (SIL) defined, dependent on the control system. The risk associated with the safety function is estimated in accordance with IEC 62061, with consideration given to the following parameters:

  • •Severity of injury (Se)
  • •Frequency and duration of exposure (Fr)
  • •Probability of occurrence of a hazardous event (Pr)
  • •Probability of avoiding or limiting harm (Av)

 

SIL classification in accordance with IEC 62061

Classification of severity (Se)

Consequences

Severity (Se)

Irreversible: death, losing an eye or arm

4

Irreversible: broken limb(s), losing a finger(s)

3

Reversible: requiring attention from a medical practitioner

2

Reversible: requiring first aid

1

 

Classification of the frequency and duration of exposure (Fr)

Frequency of exposure

Duration (Fr) <= 10 min

Duration (Fr) > 10 min

≥ 1 per h

5

5

< 1 per h up to ≥ 1 per day

4

5

< 1 per day up to ≥ 1 every 2 weeks

3

4

< 1 every 2 weeks up to ≥ 1 per year

2

3

< 1 per year

1

2

 

Classification of probability (Pr)

Probability of occurrence

Probability (Pr)

Very high

5

Likely

4

Possible

3

Rarely

2

Negligible

1

 

Classification of probability of avoiding or limiting harm (Av)

Probability of avoiding or limiting

Avoiding and limiting (Av)

Impossible

5

Rarely

3

Probable

1

 

 

What is determination of the required Safety Integrity like in accordance with IEC 62061?

Assignment matrix for determining the required SIL (or Plr) for a safety function

MC IEC 62061 Safety Integrated Level by PILZ 4a 400

EXAMPLE: For a specific hazard where Se = 3, Fr = 4, Pr = 5 and Av = 5, then:
Cl = Fr + Pr + Av = 4 + 5 + 5 = 14
Using this table would lead to a SIL 3 or PL e being assigned to the safety function that is intended to mitigate the specific hazard.

 

How do you design a safety function?

For each safety function it is necessary to identify the critical elements for performing the function, the so-called subsystems. The selection or design of these subsystems must cater for a SIL which is equal to or higher than the required level. The combination of all of these subsystems must also enable you to reach the required SIL.

Each subsystem must meet the following requirements:

– Architectural constraints for hardware safety integrity
– Probability of dangerous random hardware failures (PFH)
– Systematic safety integrity (requirements for avoiding failures and requirements for controlling systematic faults)

 

Architectural constraints of a subsystem

The SIL value that subsystems achieve is influenced by the architecture of the control system and the “Safe failure fraction” (SFF) or diagnostic level.

Safe failure fraction
(SFF)

Hardware fault tolerance
HFT 0

Hardware fault tolerance
HFT 1

Hardware fault tolerance
HFT 2

< 60 %

Not permitted, unless well-tried components

SIL 1

SIL 2

60 % to < 90 %

SIL 1

SIL 2

SIL 3

90 % to < 99 %

SIL 2

SIL 3

SIL 3

>= 99 %

SIL 3

SIL 3

SIL 3

HFT: Hardware fault tolerance
SFF: Safe failure fraction

 

Requirements for the probability of dangerous random hardware failures

The probability of a dangerous failure of any safety-related control function (SRCF) because of dangerous random hardware failures shall be equal to or less than the failure threshold value defined in the safety requirements specification.

SIL level in accordance with IEC 62061

Probability of a dangerous failure per hour (PFHD) [1/h]

SIL 3

>= 10 E-8 to < 10 E-7

SIL 2

>= 10 E-7 to < 10 E-6

SIL 1

>= 10 E-6 to < 10 E-5

 

Why not try PILZ’s calculation tool (PAScal), which you can use to determine the relevant characteristic values with ease?

 

Further information:

Their experts will be happy to support you with the implementation of IEC 62061, thereby ensuring safe operation of your plant and machinery.

To learn more about PILZ services for automation, plant, and machinery safety, click here 

To use their Safety Calculator PAScal – Calculation tool for verifying functional safety, click here 

PILZ Logo 300x150

 

 

Source

 

Related Articles


Latest Articles

  • How the NX102 Controller Streamlines Machine Automation with EtherCAT and CIP Safety

    November 12, 2024 In today’s manufacturing landscape, the complexity of machine control systems often leads to increased costs, extended implementation times, and challenging maintenance requirements. Omron’s NX102 Machine Automation Controller addresses these challenges head-on by seamlessly integrating EtherCAT motion control and CIP Safety functionality into a single, powerful platform. Simplified Network Architecture Through Integration The NX102 controller… Read More…

  • 3 Things Manufacturers Should Know About Industry 5.0

    November 12, 2024 While many manufacturers are still embracing the principles of Industry 4.0, the next evolution, Industry 5.0, is already beginning to take shape. Unlike Industry 4.0, which was a giant leap forward in automation and digitalization, Industry 5.0 represents a reconsideration of how smart technology platforms can work alongside humans. This includes technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), the Industrial… Read More…


Featured Article

Revolutionizing Material Movement with Autonomous Mobile Robots

Revolutionizing Material Movement with Autonomous Mobile Robots

In today’s fast-paced manufacturing and logistics industries, the need for efficient and flexible material movement solutions has never been greater. Traditional methods like conveyor systems, forklifts, and manual pushcarts have served us well, but they come with limitations.

That’s why Omron is thrilled to announce the launch of their game-changing MD Series of Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs). Read more


Products

  • FLO Confirms FLO Station Eligibility for ZEVIP Funding in 2024

    November 21, 2024 FLO confirms that all FLO commercial charging stations remain eligible for ZEVIP funding under this new federal directive Canada recently announced trade measures impacting vehicles from China and limiting eligibility under the Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) Zero Emission Vehicle Infrastructure Program (ZEVIP) to electric vehicle (EV) charging products manufactured in countries that have negotiated free… Read More…

  • Omron’s D40A-2 Non-Contact Interlock Door Switch

    November 21, 2024 Next-generation, non-contact safety interlock switch for most common safety applications. The D40A-2 Non-Contact Safety Door Switch is designed to enhance safety and efficiency in industrial environments. This advanced switch exceeds safety standards and is ideal for manufacturing settings, featuring a coded magnetic mechanism that improves reliability and prevents bypassing. It includes 2-color… Read More…